The crypto world’s been buzzing since Donald Trump took the stage at Bitcoin 2024 in Nashville, declaring himself the “Bitcoin President.” Fast forward 200 days, and the question’s still hanging in the air: Is a second Trump term a win for crypto, or should we be side-eyeing this whole thing?
Let’s rewind. Back in July, Trump didn’t just show up—he leaned in hard, promising to champion Bitcoin and crypto if reelected. For an industry used to being treated like the weird cousin at Thanksgiving, this was big. But 200 days later, the hype’s settling, and the reality’s a little more complicated.
Trump’s pivot from calling Bitcoin a “scam” to embracing it as a political tool was a 180-degree flip that left even the most seasoned crypto heads doing a double-take. His campaign’s been raking in crypto donations, and he’s even started selling NFTs (because of course he did). But actions speak louder than memes, and so far, the policy details are still pretty fuzzy.
On one hand, Trump’s team has been dropping hints about rolling back some of the SEC’s more aggressive crypto regulations. Gary Gensler’s been a thorn in the industry’s side, and the idea of a less hostile regulator has some folks breathing easier. Plus, Trump’s been vocal about keeping Bitcoin mining in the U.S., framing it as an energy and economic win. That’s music to the ears of miners who’ve been getting squeezed by rising costs and regulatory uncertainty.
But let’s not get too starry-eyed. Trump’s track record on financial regulation isn’t exactly “hands-off.” His first term saw a mix of deregulation and unpredictable policy shifts, and there’s no guarantee crypto would get a free pass. Plus, his administration could easily pivot if Bitcoin’s price volatility starts making headlines for the wrong reasons.
Then there’s the bigger picture. Trump’s not exactly a tech libertarian—he’s a dealmaker, and crypto’s just another piece on the board. If it serves his agenda, great. If it doesn’t? Well, we’ve seen how quickly he can change his tune.
The crypto community’s split. Some see Trump as the best shot at mainstream legitimacy, while others are skeptical of tying the industry’s fate to a single politician. After all, crypto’s supposed to be about decentralization, not putting all your eggs in one orange basket.
So, 200 days in, what’s the verdict? It’s too early to call it a slam dunk. Trump’s crypto love might be genuine, or it might just be another campaign tactic. Either way, the next few months could set the tone for how crypto’s treated in the U.S. for years to come.
One thing’s for sure: The Bitcoin President title’s got everyone watching. Whether that’s a good thing? We’ll see.
Comments (No)